|
|
|
24.
Guest_carned
says
02 June 2008
United States
male
positive
If you look into creationist's eyes you'll see, habits,traditions and less information.
"A man is accepted into a church for what he believes and he is turned out for what he knows". - Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain) |
|
|
| |
Guest users cannot add signature links
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
22.
lost_in_web
says
02 May 2007
Moldova
male
negative
the most popular topic of eyje. Why? Because people have problems with this. Religion is not an activity in life. It's what the Whole life and future life is. Atheism is jerk. |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
20.
why_i_am_here
says
16 April 2007
Turkey
male
negative
Another way of making new friends. Simple way of being cool. But the point is they are not cool, they're just trying to be meaningful and trying to look deeper with grumpy faces. But they forget that, time is running and life is not enough long to waste with such like simple tricks. Life is more serious... |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
19.
dotdotdot
says
11 April 2007
Sudan
male
negative
When you ask an atheist about benefits of being an atheist, generally they start to find different similarities about creation for fun. I can easily say that, there is no benefist in this job. No, i'm not pragmatist, i don't do everything for benefits but this is about the Whole life and this is more important than ordinary decisions. "One thought" can change to whole (life+future life). So, after big researches, people should choose this way. We have enought time to discover youtube videos but don't we have time to research religions? After researches, it's easy to find the truth with your heart. Because it's all about senses. If you have fall in love with someone you can easily realise that, there is something out of the "materials". |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
18.
guyfromitaly
says
11 April 2007
Italy
male
positive
there's a lot of people that just IGNORE reality adding supernatural causes to things that are plain natural.
that's funny. |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
17.
dotdotdot
says
11 April 2007
Sudan
male
negative
One of the division is; "fun". Searching for "fun" in everything... Is easier than being face to face to the realities...
"Easy" had been always simple... |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
16.
why_i_am_here
says
03 April 2007
Turkey
male
negative
(you should read this article carefully)
What we have covered so far shows us that the attributes of the universe discovered by science point to the existence of God. Science leads us to the conclusion that the universe has a Creator and this Creator is perfect in might, wisdom and knowledge. It is religion that shows us the way to knowing God. It is therefore possible to say that science is a method we use to better see and investigate the realities addressed by religion. Nevertheless, today, some of the scientists who step forth in the name of science take an entirely different stand. In their view, scientific discoveries do not imply the creation of God. They have, on the contrary, projected an atheistic understanding of science by saying that it is not possible to reach God through scientific data: they claim that science and religion are two clashing notions.
As a matter of fact, this atheistic understanding of science is quite recent. Until a few centuries ago, science and religion were never thought to clash with each other, and science was accepted as a method of proving the existence of God. The so-called atheistic understanding of science flourished only after the materialist and positivist philosophies swept through the world of science in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Particularly after Charles Darwin postulated the theory of evolution in 1859, circles holding a materialistic world view started to ideologically defend this theory, which they looked upon as an alternative to religion. The theory of evolution argued that the universe was not created by a creator but came into being by chance. As a result, it was asserted that religion was in conflict with science. The British researchers Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln wrote on this issue:
For Isaac Newton, a century and a half before Darwin, science was not separate from religion but, on the contrary, an aspect of religion, and ultimately subservient to it� But the science of Darwin's time became precisely that, divorcing itself from the context in which it had previously existed and established itself as a rival absolute, an alternative repository of meaning. As a result, religion and science were no longer working in concert, but rather stood opposed to each other, and humanity was increasingly forced to choose between them.25
As we stated before, the so-called split between science and religion was totally ideological. Some scientists, who earnestly believed in materialism, conditioned themselves to prove that the universe had no creator and they devised various theories in this context. The theory of evolution was the most famous and the most important of them. In the field of astronomy as well certain theories were developed such as the "steady-state theory" or the "chaos theory". However, all of these theories that denied creation were demolished by science itself, as we have clearly shown in the previous chapters.
Today, scientists who still keep to these theories and insist on denying all things religious, are dogmatic and bigoted people, who have conditioned themselves not to believe in God. The famous English zoologist and evolutionist D.M.S. Watson confesses to this dogmatism as he explains why he and his colleagues accept the theory of evolution:
If so, it will present a parallel to the theory of evolution itself, a theory universally accepted, not because it can be proved by logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible.26
What Watson means by "special creation" is God's creation. As acknowledged, this scientist finds this "unacceptable". But why? Is it because science says so? Actually it does not. On the contrary, science proves the truth of creation. The only reason why Watson looks upon this fact as unacceptable is because he has conditioned himself to deny the existence of God. All other evolutionists take the same stand.
Evolutionists rely not on science but on materialist philosophy and they distort science to make it agree with this philosophy. A geneticist and an outspoken evolutionist from Harvard University, Richard Lewontin, confesses to this truth:
It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, so we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.27
On the other hand, today, just as in history, there are, as opposed to this dogmatic materialist group, scientists who confirm God's existence, and regard science as a way of knowing Him. Some trends developing in the USA such as "Creationism" or "Intelligent Design" prove by scientific evidence that all living things were created by God.
This shows us that science and religion are not conflicting sources of information, but that, on the contrary, science is a method that verifies the absolute truths provided by religion. The clash between religion and science can only hold true for certain religions that incorporate some superstitious elements as well as divine sources. However, this is certainly out of the question for Islam, which relies only on the pure revelation of God. Moreover, Islam particularly advocates scientific enquiry, and announces that probing the universe is a method to explore the creation of God. The following verse of the Qur'an addresses this issue;
Do they not look at the sky above them? How We have built it and adorned it, and there are no rifts therein? And the earth - We have spread it out, and set thereon mountains standing firm, and caused it to bring forth plants of beauteous kinds (in pairs). And We send down from the sky blessed water whereby We give growth unto gardens and the grain of crops. And tall palm-trees, with shoots of fruit-stalks, piled one over another. (The Quran, 50:6-7, 9-10)
As the above verses imply, the Qur'an always urges people to think, to reason and to explore everything in the world in which they live. This is because science supports religion, saves the individual from ignorance, and causes him to think more consciously; it opens wide one's world of thought and helps one grasp the signs of God self-evident in the universe. Prominent German physicist Max Planck said:
Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: Ye must have faith. It is a quality which the scientist cannot dispense with.28
All the issues we have treated so far simply put it that the existence of the universe and all living things cannot be explained by coincidences. Many scientists who have left their mark on the world of science have confirmed, and still confirm this great reality. The more people learn about the universe, the higher does their admiration for its flawless order become. Every newly-discovered detail supports creation in an unquestionable way.
The great majority of modern physicists accept the fact of creation as we set foot in the 21st century. David Darling, astronomer and author, says:
There were no landmarks here. No galaxies, no stars. Only a heartbeat ago the universe itself began in the most titanic of explosions, an explosion in which all the matter and energy there would ever be spontaneously appeared and was borne swiftly out upon the stretching fabric of space. One second old was the universe, and it was filled exclusively with the steaming, fertile brew of creation.29
Besides, it is already known that almost all the founders of diverse scientific branches believed in God and His divine books. The greatest physicists in history, Newton, Faraday, Kelvin and Maxwell are a few examples of such scientists.
In the time of Isaac Newton, the great physicist, scientists believed that the movements of the heavenly bodies and planets could be explained by different laws. Nevertheless, Newton believed that the creator of earth and space was the same, and therefore they had to be explained by the same laws. He wrote:
This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being. 30
As is evident, thousands of scientists who have been doing research in the fields of physics, mathematics, and astronomy since the Middle Ages all agree on the idea that the universe is created by a single Creator and always focus on the same point. The founder of physical astronomy, Johannes Kepler, stated his strong belief in God in one of his books in which he wrote:
Since we astronomers are priests of the highest God in regard to the book of nature, it befits us to be thoughtful, not of the glory of our minds, but rather, above all else, of the glory of God.31
The great physicist, William Thompson (Lord Kelvin), who founded thermodynamics, was a Christian who believed in God. He had strongly opposed Darwin's theory of evolution and totally rejected it. He explained shortly before his death that "With regard to the origin of life, science� positively affirms creative power."32
One of the professors of physics at Oxford University, Robert Matthews, states the same fact in his book published in 1992 where he explains that DNA molecules were created by God:
The whole process normally takes place in perfect harmony, producing a foetus, then a living baby, a child and finally an adult. Like so much in biology, the whole process is seemingly miraculous. How can such stunning complexity be produced from such simple beginnings? How, in short, does a single cell far smaller than the dot of this letter "i" produce a sentient being? Many of the processes involved remain mysterious, and constitute one of the most fascinating of all the Outstanding Mysteries.33
Some other scientists who admit that the universe is created by a Creator and who are known by their cited attributes are:
Robert Boyle (the father of modern chemistry)
Iona William Petty (known for his studies on statistics and modern economy)
Michael Faraday (one of the greatest physicists of all times)
Gregory Mendel (the father of genetics; he invalidated Darwinism with his discoveries in the science of genetics)
Louis Pasteur (the greatest name in bacteriology; he declared war on Darwinism)
John Dalton (the father of atomic theory)
Blaise Pascal (one of the most important mathematicians)
John Ray (the most important name in British natural history)
Nicolaus Steno (a famous stratiographer who investigated earth layers)
Carolus Linnaeus (the father of biological classification)
Georges Cuvier (the founder of comparative anatomy)
Matthew Maury (the founder of oceanography)
Thomas Anderson (one the pioneers in the field of organic chemistry)
by Harun Yahya |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
13.
evza
says
03 April 2007
Italy
male
negative
Belieiving in God is limitation for the people. If you think that, there will be settlement, you can limit your behaviours. For example you can't steal something or you can't create child porn when you're alone, you can't say lie because of the punishment.
But if you don't believe in God, you can do whatever you want. Because your life is limited (in the real meaning) with time. If you live a 60 years of life, you would try to do whatever you can,because everything you get is "benefit" and you would try to get as much as you can.
We need to hurry because we don't have enough time to decide. We should believe in God. Why? Because, i will not able to think more clear or more creative when i'm an atheist. I will not be more scientific when i'm atheist.
Because atheism brings me anger, depression, fear of death, pessimistic point of view and afraid of life.
If i believe in God, i will have no risk. I'm totally sure that there is a God. I have no doubt for this but if i hadn't be sure, i would still believe in God. Because this is the logical way.
Every object, every living things, water, air, everything are suitible and located magnificent for the human. Can this be coincidence? Or distance of the planets and sun, it's ideal and 1mm of change can destroy everyhing. Is his coincidence? I don't think so.
Generally atheists choose this way to think more clear and feel fine. A person can be powerful, if he is powerful. Being atheist is being alone. Most of them are atheists because of their "vanity". They don't want to be under a Creator. God and a human... Don't you afraid of the anger of God? Why is this vanity? You lose yourself when you're making sex, you can't control when your favourite music is playing, you dance when the World is hungry and you you... You are incomplete... God is complete. Because God has created you. You can rebirth only with your Creator. Sometimes words fly but the truth don't change... Vanity is the "evil" and the biggest problem for the people of the World. I'm incomplete, i need God to live on. I know this and i'm sure of this. Atheists and the believers have to have a difference but vanity shouldn't be one of this. |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
12.
guyfromitaly
says
03 April 2007
Italy
male
positive
you have been nothing from the beginning to the moment of your birth (was that that bad?), when you die you become nothing again..end of the story
while living live as best as you can and then .. nothing! |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
11.
skylla
says
03 April 2007
Greece
male
balanced
I feel myself confused everytime when i think about the "God", "Atheism" or something else. This page is another confusing page in my life. I've carefully read every comment and i'm more confused now. Probably, i should think about it later. (i do this everytime) |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
10.
evza
says
03 April 2007
Italy
male
negative
It should be very amazing to feel fine while believing that death is the end... |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
9.
guyfromitaly
says
03 April 2007
Italy
male
positive
I put my hope in science not in a so called god,
and I think I can live quite fine with that.
atheism=disallow senses .. WHAT? That's the exactly opposite. |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
8.
evza
says
21 March 2007
Italy
male
negative
atheism=loneliness
atheism=pain
atheism=trendy
atheism=being confused
atheism=feeling empty
atheism=an empty word
atheism=loser activity
atheism=being materialist
atheism=disallow senses
atheism=having nothing
atheism=0
(a "friend" send me a message about respecting to other religions but atheism is not a religion,it's only a thougt) |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
7.
mekasemi
says
21 March 2007
Australia
male
balanced
i'm so confused about atheism. my parents and friends call me as pragmatist. when i look from this window; atheism gives me nothing. the only thing that i want to have in my life is "feeling happy". when i hear about atheism, i don't remember "freedom" before "loneliness"... |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
5.
dotdotdot
says
16 March 2007
Sudan
male
negative
people follow if a thought is trendy. nowadays, atheism is trendy and people get popularity points with this thought. but when the people gone, when it's night, when they leave alone, pain cover them and set them "hopeless". life is not cheap to spend it for simple popularity. life is a serious thing. |
|
|
| |
Author didn't indicate any links yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
World Thinks; (according to all comments) |
|
%21 |
%63 |
%17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
